David McPhie’s experience is focused on high-stakes intellectual property disputes and other complex litigation. He has secured hundreds of millions of dollars in recoveries for plaintiffs and has successfully represented many defendants, with multiple trial victories recognized as “Top Defense Verdicts” by the Daily Journal. His substantial appellate experience includes arguing appeals before the Federal Circuit and D.C. Circuit. David has also litigated numerous matters before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

David has applied his legal and technical expertise in cases spanning a wide range of technologies, including medical devices, software, computer networking and security, storage media, semiconductors, and consumer electronics. Before his legal career, he co-authored the book Perl How to Program, published by Deitel & Associates.

Following law school, David clerked for the Honorable Samuel A. Alito, Jr., who was then on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

In his current role as partner emeritus, David devotes his time to teaching and volunteer church service. He has taught patent law for several years at the University of California, Irvine School of Law.

Experience

  • Represented network security company in asserting claims of willful patent infringement against competitor founded by former employee. Won early dispositive ruling on key defense and successfully fought off challenges to asserted patents on summary judgment and in the Patent Office. Case ultimately settled for $175 million.
  • Defended semiconductor technology client against claim for over $200 million based on alleged breach of contract and breach of implied warranty of noninfringement. Obtained complete defense verdict at trial and an award of over $5 million in attorneys' fees to the defendant. Both verdict and fees were affirmed on appeal.
  • Brought claims for willful patent infringement on behalf of pioneering medical device company. Defendant’s counterclaims were eliminated in early motion practice. On summary judgment, court determined at least one asserted claim was both valid and infringed by defendant and that lost profits were available as damages. Defendant agreed to pay $60 million plus ongoing royalty to resolve case before trial.
  • Defended networking device manufacturer against patent infringement claims accusing products responsible for $4 billion in annual revenue. Won summary judgment of invalidity and noninfringement on all claims, plus award of costs.
  • Represented enterprise software company in case alleging willful copyright infringement and seeking disgorgement of profits “believed to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars.” On summary judgment, court found all asserted copyrights infringed and valid as a matter of law, and also rejected defendant’s affirmative defenses on copyright liability. Case settled shortly thereafter.
  • Took over representation of semiconductor equipment manufacturer accused of patent infringement after adverse appellate ruling. At trial, obtained jury verdict of patent invalidity for all asserted claims on multiple grounds. The Federal Circuit subsequently affirmed the judgment in its entirety.
  • Defended networking device company in multiple related patent infringement suits. Successfully moved to transfer cases out of the Eastern District of Texas, initiated Patent Office proceedings, and obtained stay of litigation. All asserted claims were ultimately cancelled by the Patent Office.
  • Brought infringement suit against major manufacturer of laptop computers based on patented memory control technology. Obtained sanctions order excluding defendant’s noninfringement expert from testifying at trial and severely limiting scope of opening statement and closing argument. Case settled shortly thereafter.
  • Represented applied research institute in extensive litigation asserting infringement of patent claims relating to satellite radio technology. Successfully defended validity of all claims before the Patent Office. Argued and won four related appeals in the Federal Circuit and D.C. Circuit. (Case was still pending at time of retirement.)
  • Took over defense of medical device company in patent infringement case after adverse jury verdict of infringement and validity. Successfully challenged validity of multiple asserted claims on appeal to Federal Circuit and in Patent Office. At subsequent damages trial on remaining claims, jury found for client, rejecting claim for $217 million in damages and rendering verdict of no willful infringement. In related case, court granted Daubert motion against plaintiff’s damages expert, and case settled shortly after court issued show-cause order challenging plaintiff to identify any surviving damages theory.
  • Prosecuted patent enforcement campaign in multiple jurisdictions on behalf of leading provider of speech-recognition software. Case concluded successfully with acquisition of defendant.
  • Defended technology company in patent infringement case brought as part of serial enforcement campaign in Eastern District of Texas. Successfully moved to transfer case on showing client was third-party beneficiary of earlier licensee’s forum selection clause, and plaintiff immediately settled.
  • Defended restaurant chain in consumer class action involving claims of false advertising and unfair competition. Prevailed at pleading stage with successful motions to dismiss both original and amended complaints.

Publications

  • “Almost Private: Pen Registers, Packet Sniffers, and Privacy at the Margin,” 2005 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 1 (2005)
  • “Access Made Accessible: Shaping the Laws and Technologies that Protect Creative Works,” 51 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 521 (2004)
  • “Old Drugs, New Uses: Solving a Hatch-Waxman Patent Predicament,” 59 Food & Drug L.J. 155 (2004)
  • Book Note, 15 Harv. J. Law & Tech. 539 (2002) (reviewing Stuart Biegel, Beyond Our Control? Confronting the Limits of Our Legal System in the Age of Cyberspace (2001))

Speaking Engagements

  • “The America Invents Act: Its Vision and Its Impact,” Howard T. Markey Intellectual Property American Inn of Court (January 14, 2025) (co-presenter)
  • “Lessons Learned: Practical Application of the Supreme Court's Decisions for Patent Prosecutors and Litigators,” Orange County Bar Association, Intellectual Property & Technology Law Section (August 17, 2015)
  • Guest Lecturer, “Challenging Patents in the Courts and the PTO,” Patent Law Course, University of California, Irvine School of Law (September 26, 2012)
  • Guest Lecturer, “Reexamination and Litigation,” Patent Law Course, University of California, Irvine (November 16, 2010)

Professional Activities

  • Lecturer, University of California, Irvine School of Law
  • Harvard Alumni Association, South Orange County
  • J. Reuben Clark Law Society, Orange County Chapter
  • Howard T. Markey Intellectual Property American Inn of Court

Education

Harvard Law School (J.D., 2003), magna cum laude

Harvard College (B.A., Physics 2000), magna cum laude

Admissions

  • California
  • U.S. District Court for the Central, Northern and Southern Districts of California
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth and Federal Circuit
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • U.S. Supreme Court

Clerkships

  • Hon. Samuel A. Alito Jr., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jump to Page
Close

Irell & Manella LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek