- University of Colorado School of Law (J.D.); Order of the Coif; Seaman Scholar; Galland Scholarship; George Kerr Memorial Scholarship; Colorado Trial Lawyers Association Litigation Award; Business Law Society; Intellectual Property Law Society; Moot Court
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (B.S., Biology, Minor in Chemistry), with distinction
Maclain Wells is counsel in the Los Angeles office of Irell & Manella LLP, where he specializes in patent and trademark litigation. Mr. Wells has assisted clients in numerous intellectual property matters, including cases relating to digital video recorders, computer hard drives, LCD panels, online business methods & software, pharmaceuticals, and cancer diagnostics and treatment methods. He also has experience in evaluating and licensing intellectual property portfolios. Mr. Wells has been recognized as a Southern California Rising Star by Super Lawyers magazine.
Representative clients include: TiVo, the University of California at Santa Barbara, the University of Pennsylvania, eBay, PayPal, LSI/Agere Systems, and Chi Mei Optoelectronics.
TiVo v. AT&T. (E.D. Texas): Represented TiVo in a suit against AT&T, alleging that AT&T's U-verse products and services infringed three of TiVo's patents covering DVR technology. In 2010, AT&T launched a counter-suit in California accusing TiVo DVRs of violating three AT&T patents. In January 2012, just days before a trial on TiVo's patents, AT&T agreed to pay TiVo a minimum of $215 million, plus additional fees in case AT&T's DVR subscriber base exceeds certain levels.
St. Jude Medical v. Access Closure, Inc. (W.D. Ark.): Represented St. Jude Medical in a patent case alleging infringement of St. Jude's patents relating to vascular closure devices. In December 2010, the jury returned a verdict of willful patent infringement and awarded St. Jude $27.1 million in damages.
TiVo v. Verizon. (E.D. Texas): Represented TiVo in a patent infringement suit against Verizon accusing the company of infringing three of TiVo's DVR technology patents. In September 2012, shortly before trial was scheduled to begin, a settlement was reached in which Verizon agreed to provide TiVo with total compensation worth at least $250.4 million. As part of the settlement, TiVo and Verizon agreed to dismiss all pending litigation between the companies with prejudice. The parties also entered into a cross license of their respective patent portfolios in the advanced television field.
LG Display v. Chi Mei Optoelectronics. (D. Del.): Represents Chi Mei Optoelectronics in a set of patent litigations involving LCD panel technology.
NXP v. LSI and Agere. (N.D. Cal.): Represents LSI and Agere in a set of patent litigations involving semiconductor manufacturing technology and circuit design.
Netcraft v. eBay/PayPal. (W.D. Wis.): Represented eBay/PayPal in a patent infringement suit brought by a non-practicing entity. In 2007, eBay/PayPal were awarded summary judgment of non-infringement. In 2008, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling.
AmberWave v. Intel. (D. Del., E.D. Tex.): Represented AmberWave, a company founded by an MIT professor and his students, in a set of patent litigations relating to advanced semiconductor materials and manufacturing processes.
TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Communications Corporation. (E.D. Texas): Represents TiVo in connection with patent infringement suits in the Eastern District of Texas involving digital video recording ("DVR") products and services.
- "Indefiniteness In Inter Partes Review Proceedings," Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society (March 2016)
- “2015 Patent Reform: Is It Happening?” Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property, co-author (October 14, 2015)
- "It’s Finally Time to Modernize Our Patent System," Los Angeles Daily Journal, co-author (July 5, 2011)
- "The Patent Reform Act of 2007: Attempting to Modernize the U.S. Patent System," Federal Bar Association Newsletter (Winter 2008)
- "Redefining Prior Art Under Proposed Patent Reform Measures," ALM's Patent Strategy and Management Journal (in two parts, June and July 2008).
Bar & Court Admissions
- 2002, California
- United States Patent and Trademark Office
- U.S. Courts of Appeals, Ninth and Federal Circuits
- U.S. District Court, Northern and Central Districts of California