- University of Southern California (J.D., 1984)
- University of California at Los Angeles (B.S., Economics, 1981)
Robert M. (“Bobby”) Schwartz is a litigation partner in the Los Angeles office of Irell & Manella LLP. Over a thirty-two year career, he has become a nationally recognized leader in large-stakes disputes, particularly class actions. Mr. Schwartz has successfully represented some of the country’s most influential companies in matters of far-reaching significance in a range of subject areas, including:
- Copyright and trademark
- Corporate governance
- Employment, including class actions alleging discrimination and misclassification of employees as independent contractors
- First Amendment and anti-SLAPP practice
- Government investigations and regulatory proceedings
- Media/Content finance, creation, and distribution, including motion pictures, television programs, recorded music, and video games
- Patent and trade secrets
- Right of privacy and right of publicity
- Unfair competition and false advertising
Illustrative publicly-reported cases:
- ABS Entertainment, et al. v. CBS and CBS Broadcasting (C.D. Cal. and S.D.N.Y.): Representing radio broadcaster in putative class actions alleging “performance right” to sound recordings created before February 15, 1972.
- Vigal v. Take-Two Interactive (S.D.N.Y.): Defending video game publisher against class action alleging violation of biometric privacy statute arising from feature that allows user to create avatar based on user’s photographs.
- In re FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc. Employment Practices Litigation (MDL Case No. 1700, N.D. Ind.): Lead counsel for defendant in more than 50 class-action lawsuits in 42 states seeking to reclassify as “employees” thousands of independent contractors engaged in package pick-up and delivery services.
- Lipschutz v. AT&T, et al. (C.D. Cal.): Successfully defended Internet service provider in nationwide antitrust class action by defeating motion for class certification.
- In re Compact Disc Antitrust Litigation (California Judicial Council Coord. Proc. No. 4123): Represented record company in antitrust class actions arising from pricing of compact discs.
- MGM Studios Inc., et al. v. Grokster, Inc., et al., 545 U.S. 913 (2005): Successfully represented motion picture studio and record company plaintiffs in copyright infringement suit against Grokster, Morpheus, and Kazaa networks, culminating in landmark 9–0 United States Supreme Court decision adopting “active inducement” theory of contributory copyright infringement.
- In re Hulu Privacy Litigation (N.D. Cal.): Successfully defended consolidated putative class action cases involving the Video Privacy Protection Act and related privacy statutes, based on the allegation that the defendant knowingly disclosed personally identifiable information about its users. Defeated class certification and obtained summary judgment on liability.
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hollinger International, Inc. and Conrad Black (Delaware Chancery Court; U.S.D.C. N.D. Ill.): On behalf of special committee of board of directors of media holding company, investigated and prosecuted former senior officers and directors for looting assets. Enforced SEC appointment of special master to prevent controlling shareholder from interfering with investigation and disposition of assets. Barred target from filing parallel actions in Canada.
- Garrison v. Warner Bros., et al. (C.D. Cal.): Successfully represented motion picture studios against class action brought by thousands of high-level employees who claimed their compensation was “unconscionably” low and the product of an antitrust conspiracy among the industry’s major employers. Obtained decertification of class.
- In re: Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Construction Cost Proceedings (NM PUC & Supreme Court of New Mexico): Represented public utility before regulatory agency to include $1.2 billion investment in nuclear power plants in client’s rate base. Worked on similar case for California public utility in dispute over $5.5 billion in costs to build Diablo Canyon nuclear facility.
- Locke v. Sega of America, Inc. and Gearbox Software (N.D. Cal.): Defended developer of video game against consumer class action alleging that the game’s features and experience were overstated in advertising. Defeated class certification. Plaintiffs dismissed case with prejudice.
- Jason West and Vince Zampella v. Activision Publishing, Inc. (L.A.S.C.): Represented creators of the Call of Duty and Modern Warfare video games in dispute over termination and failure to receive compensation.
- Leicester v. Warner Bros., 232 F.3d 1212 (9th Cir. 2000): Prevailed at trial and on appeal on copyright and trademark claims based on unauthorized photography of plaintiff’s work in scenes of movie Batman Forever and use on film-related merchandise.
Honors & Awards
- The American Lawyer "Litigator of the Week" (2015)
- The Legal 500 United States, “Leading Lawyer” (2008-2015)
- Best Lawyers In America (2010-2017)
- Chambers USA, "Media & Entertainment: Litigation – California" (2010-2016)
- Daily Journal, "75 Leading IP Litigators" (2010, 2016)
- "Power Lawyers" The Hollywood Reporter (2007-2016)
- Mr. Schwartz is the author of four chapters in the 2011 Oxford University Press treatise Entertainment Litigation and the 2014 revision, Entertainment Law & Litigation: COPYRIGHT (direct infringement and secondary liability), and LAW OF IDEAS.
- Board of Directors, Chairperson, Bet Tzedek Legal Services
Bar & Court Admissions
- U.S. Supreme Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Second, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits
- U.S. District Court, Central, Northern, Eastern Districts of California